-
Validity and Reliability of the ‘Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale' – 16-Item Version (DERS-16) – with University Students in EcuadorViteri-Miranda, V.; Regatto-Bonifaz, J.; Moreta-Herrera, R.; Jiménez-Borja, M.; Jiménez-Mosquera, C.J.HTML113
Viteri-Miranda, V., Regatto-Bonifaz, J., Moreta-Herrera, R., Jiménez-Borja, M., Jiménez-Mosquera, C.-J. (2025). Validity and Reliability of the ‘Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale' – 16-Item Version (DERS-16) – with University Students in Ecuador, Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 18(3), 00-00.
copied
-
Background. Emotional regulation difficulties (ERD) are present in the Ecuadorian university student population; however, the specific assessment measures available do not allow for an efficient assessment.
Objective. To validate the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale -16 Item Version (DERS-16) with Ecuadorian university students.
Methodology. The research uses a descriptive and instrumental statistical analysis of the DERS-16 to analyze the validity of the construct, validity based with other variables (divergence) and the internal consistency of the model.
Participants. 670 university students from two public universities in Ecuador (76% women and 24% men). The average age was 25.9 with a 7.1 standard deviation (SD).
Results. A hierarchical factorial model with five first-order factors and one second-order general factor fit the data reasonably well. The model has adequate internal consistency and construct validity; particularly for the second-order general factor. The DERS-16 also shows divergence validity with the Academic Situation-Specific Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (EAPESA-9).
Conclusion. The DERS-16 is a consistent and reliable scale for the measurement of emotional regulation in Ecuadorian university students.
Keywords: emotional regulation difficulties/ reliability/ emotional regulation/ validity/ university students
-